| Arcana Dana Dan... さんのプロフィールDan's Esoteric Arcanaブログリストゲストブック | ヘルプ |
|
5月30日 Let's Say That I Break Into Your HouseLet's Say That I Break Into Your House
Recently, large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that Congress is finally addressing the issue of illegal immigration.
Certain people are angry that the US might protect its own borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely.
Let's see if we correctly understand the thinking behind these protests.
Let's say I break into your house. Let's say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave.
But I say, "I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and done the laundry
and swept the floors. I've done all the things you don't like to do. I'm hard-working and honest (except for when I broke into your house)." According to the protesters:
You are Required to let me stay in your house
You are Required to add me to your family's insurance plan You are Required to Educate my kids You are Required to Provide other benefits to me & to my family (my husband will do all of your yard work because he is also hard-working and honest, except for that breaking in part). If you try to call the police or force me out, I will call my friends who will picket your
house carrying signs that proclaim my RIGHT to be there. It's only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just
trying to better myself. I'm a hard-working and honest, person, except for well, you know, I did break into your house. And what a deal it is for me!!!
I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of cold, uncaring, selfish, prejudiced, and bigoted behavior.
Oh yeah, I DEMAND that you to learn MY LANGUAGE!!! so you can communicate with me. And don't forget to make sure your forms are in MY language - I need to understand them...
Why can't people see how ridiculous this is?! Only in America....
Please pass this on ( in English ). Share it if you see the value of it.
If not blow it off.........along with your future Social Security funds, and a lot of other things. STOP THE TRASHING OF OUR SOVEREIGNTY!If you thought that Ted Kennedy and John McCain simply wanted to give Amnesty to 12-20 million illegal aliens... then you haven't heard -- as Paul Harvey would say -- "the rest of the story." According to a report by WorldNetDaily.com, this amnesty bill ALSO legitimizes the eventual formation of a North American Union -- and with it the construction of a "North American Superhighway" -- a plan that until now, our elected officials told us was an urban legend... a myth... a fairy tale. WorldNetDaily.com claims its right there in black-and-white: "WASHINGTON -- The controversial 'Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007,' which would grant millions of illegal aliens the right to stay in the U.S. under certain conditions, contains provisions for the acceleration of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, a plan for North American economic and defense integration, WND has learned." "The bill, as worked out by Senate and White House negotiators, cites the SPP agreement signed by President Bush and his counterparts in Mexico and Canada March 23, 2005 -- an agreement that has been criticized as a blueprint for building a European Union-style merger of the three countries of North America." "'It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico, which will lead to reduced migration,' the draft legislation states on page 211 on the version time-stamped May 18, 2007 11:58 p.m." So, it would appear that Democrats and Republicans -- have come up with a final solution to the millions of illegal aliens who are in this country. Forget about sealing the border. Instead, effectively merge the United States, Mexico and Canada and build a Superhighway ABOUT FOUR FOOTBALL FIELDS WIDE, running from Mexico through the U.S. heartland and into Canada. Pave the way for an invasion of 18-wheel trucks coming from Mexico -- carrying God knows what -- with no checkpoint at the border.
When conservative congressmen asked the Department of Transportation about the scheme to build this Superhighway, Jeffrey N. Shane, Undersecretary at the U.S. Department of Transportation, testified that before Congress that it was "an urban legend" -- i.e., a lie!
And now, this Amnesty bill actually calls for the United States to "accelerate the implementation" of what we were told, until now, was an urban legend!
Is the granting of Amnesty to 12-20 million illegal aliens an end or is it a means to an end? GO TO https://www.grasstopsusa.com/amnestyxxxii.html for the rest of the story -- and what YOU can do to thwart the trashing of U.S. sovereignty by George Bush and the Congress. 5月27日 Col. David Hunt Gets It RightWe Cannot or We Have Forgotten How to Fight
Friday , February 16, 2007 By Col. David Hunt
Go to: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250712,00.html for Col. Hunt's Q&A
This has to be said, written about, yelled about, cried about and fixed, or we can all start learning to pray
on rugs.
We cannot fight. Specifically, we cannot fight a global war — against anything really — but we especially don’t
seem to be able to fight one against terrorism.
We, that is, the United States of America, are the greatest country with the smartest, bravest, most
compassionate people on the planet. The problem is we have forgotten how to fight. We have elected presidents
simply because they are not someone else, and we have elections in which we argue about a war that happened 40
years ago, but hardly touched the one we are in right now. We send soldiers into war without the right gear and
claim it’s OK, even as they die.
We cannot even figure out why we go to war. Was it WMD that weren’t even there? Was it a noble act to get
Saddam out of power, which we did (but probably would not have gone to war just to do that)?
We promote generals and admirals with no combat experience and absolute zero leadership skills, who only knew
how to use PowerPoint slides, and required those slides from combat soldiers before they were allowed to go
into combat. We allow some of the deadliest, most competent warriors on the planet — United States Navy SEALS —
to sit on their ultra-conditioned butts in a war zone without using them for even one damn day.
We allow a country we completely control (Afghanistan) to become the single largest provider of raw heroin,
while the country we live in (USA) continues to be the largest users of that same heroin.
We allow victories achieved by our great soldiers to turn into Civil War at best — and complete chaos at worst.
We lose $12 billion, because we don’t know how to distribute money — so we put it on trucks, and give to people
without checking on them and what they are doing with it. We deny for years that a country (Iran) is actively
killing our soldiers. We prosecute our soldiers and Marines for shooting a bad guy too many times. We create
rules that stop our soldiers from not just protecting themselves, which would be bad enough, but even worse,
prevent them from fighting — or maybe that’s not worse, but equally criminal.
We have not captured the men directly responsible for 9/11. We have not captured these murderers because we
allow others to create safe havens where terrorists can hide and make their videotapes.
Now, some will counter my argument with patriotic remarks or with examples of how we really are doing well
because … wait for it … because we have not been attacked again. Yeah, these are the same politically-blinded
nutjobs who have allowed up to 20 million illegal aliens to not only get into our country and get drivers’
licenses and complete medical care, but also created states that will not even question the status of these
illegals, and therefore grant their children college educations. We cannot fight. Hell, we not only cannot
fight, we work against ourselves while we are trying to fight.
The things I am pointing to are happening every day in this government of non-fighters. Wake up, kick them out
of office, protest, yell, demand they protect your son’s and daughters in uniform, demand we fight and fight to
win — not just fight not to lose. We need a nation at war, not just a military fighting in one.
Right now, the State Department cannot even fill the posts they have in Iraq, because they cannot order their
people to go. Unbelievable! Right now in Iraq, there is no legal system, no banking system and close to no
government — yet we the greatest nation in the world, with thousands of government workers in D.C., and we
cannot afford, or worse, aren’t willing, to send some of them to Iraq? We not only cannot fight, we won’t. You
see, fighting is not just soldiers dying in Mosul — it is also FBI agents doing their jobs, (by the way, they
can’t, because only 33 of them speak Arabic). Fighting is also the Department of the Treasury cracking banks
with links to terrorists.
Fighting this war can happen in our homes, where we should sacrifice to help the cause. In World War II, it
happened with war bonds, moms working in factories, with blackouts, and tin drives. In this war, our leaders
not only tell us not to fight, they also tell us to go about our business as if nothing is wrong. We cannot
fight if we are lying to ourselves while we’re doing it.
“So what?” you might ask, “We have not been attacked, and well, we like this president — or we don’t, but there
is global warming or there is that blonde who died with at least four guys claiming to be the father of her
baby, while her own body is getting ripe in a morgue — or some diaper-wearing astronaut running around — or my
flat screen TV works really well.” Did I mention that we cannot fight?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colonel David Hunt has over 29 years of military experience, including extensive operational experience in Special Operations, Counter Terrorism and Intelligence Operations. You can read his complete bio here.
5月25日 The Prosecution of HillaryFrom: The Hillary Clinton Accountability Project -- a project of the United States Justice Foundation
( www.usjf.net )
It's time to shut down the Clintons -- and this is the best opportunity ever to end their reign of abuse, their
disregard for our laws, and their use of their offices for personal financial gain! Please read on.
The United States Justice Foundation ("USJF") has overcome three major hurdles in helping a courageous
whistle blower, Peter Paul, in his landmark civil suit. against Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Mr. Paul is the first person ever to file a civil suit charging a U.S. President and a U.S. Senator with fraud,
coercion and conspiracy. You may not have heard about this, because the media has completely buried it!
And to be honest, when Peter Paul first approached me about the U.S. Justice Foundation representing him, I was
skeptical. But not anymore.
In fact, this case has led to the criminal trial of Hillary's campaign finance director, David Rosen, on
charges of filing false campaign finance reports.
And it doesn't come as a surprise that Mrs. Clinton is using every trick to delay the case from moving forward.
Please go to www.usjf.net for the full story. Illegals Discombobulate Eco-nuts
Illegal Immigration Discombobulates Environmentalists Hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants tramping through fragile ecosystems and wildlife refuges discarding hundreds of thousands of tons of trash have caused incalculable environmental damage in Arizona’s Sonoran desert and the Rio Grande Valley. Yet, for reasons ranging from fear of alienating lefty donors to concerns over cutting off animal migration routes, environmentalists are opposed to border control measures.
The Associated Press reports that environmentalists who have acquired and preserved 90,000 riverfront acres of Texas scrub and forest in the Rio Grande Valley over the past 30 years object to Department of Homeland Security’s plans to erect 70 miles of fencing on wildlife refuges along the border with Mexico:
[T]hey fear the hundreds of miles of border fences will undo their work and kill some land animals by cutting them off from the Rio Grande, the only source of fresh water.
A fence could also prevent the ocelots and other animals from swimming across the water to mate with partners on the other side. …
Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke said environmental concerns will be taken into account in the final decisions. But Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has used his authority to waive environmental regulations for security reasons in other states, and Knocke said he would do so in the Rio Grande Valley if necessary. …
The refuges show signs of immigrant activity - food wrappers and water jugs, discarded wet clothing, the plastic bags used to carry a change of clothing across the river. Similar evidence is found up and down the river, despite the presence of Border Patrol agents and the sensors and cameras that make up the current “virtual” fence. One environmental impact study suggests that the actual damage caused by illegal immigration is far worse than the hypothetical harm fencing could cause. From: www.politicalmavens.com 070525 Jihad and the Islamic Mein KampfALL YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAMIC JIHAD.
THIS IS A POWERFUL VIDEO. IT WILL ERASE ANY DISILLUSIONMENT
YOU MAY HAVE HAD ABOUT THE VICIOUS ISLAMOFASCISTS WHO INTEND TO COLLAPSE THE UNITED STATES -- AND ALL OTHER FREE NATIONS -- AND SUBJECT THE GLOBE TO SHARIA LAW. DON'T MISS THE VIDEO ABOUT THE ISLAMIC MEIM KAMPF, ALSO
AVAILABLE BY CLICKING ON THE BOOK-COVER AT THE END OF THIS VIDEO. GO THERE NOW:
5月23日 Main Stream Media Aids/Abets AhmadinejadFrom: Politcalmavens.com, May 23, 2007
MSM ignores Iran terrorizing its own people
By Judith A. Klinghoffer (bio) Ahmadinejad and company do not only export terror, they also uses it to terrorize their own people. Indeed,
they are equal opportunity terrorizers. They terrorize their own children, women and men. Of course, they have
a carte blanch to do it because MSM (Main Stream Media) refuses to cover the atrocities.
This is nothing new. After all, MSM covered up the atrocities of the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, China during the Cultural
Revolution, the Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge and the Palestinian Authority. The Pulitzer Prize committee still
refuses to rescind the Pulitzer it gave New York Times reporter, Walter Duranty, for carrying out one of the cover ups. Media
vigilence stops at Western democracies' edges with the price, of course, being paid by the “people of color.” At
this moment it the Iranians who are left to the tender mercies of their “elected” madmen. Here are some of the
latest examples:
There are few more peaceful religions than the Bahai who are celebrating the anniversary of their faith in
Israel. Why Israel? Because that is where the Bahai buried the remains of their prophet who was executed in
Tabriz. There are a mere 300,000 Bahai in Iran but they are mercilessly persecuted and so are their children. A
video posted on Youtube entitled A hope and a prayer reveals (they disabled the embed, but do watch it) that a
study done earlier this year documented 150 instances of harassment, insults and physical violence inflicted on
their children within a period of a single month
There are few more peaceful religions than the Bahai who are the anniversary of their faith in Israel. Why
Israel? Because that is where the Bahai buried the remains of their prophet who was executed in Tabriz. There
are a mere 300,000 Bahai in Iran but they are mercilessly persecuted and so are their A video posted on Youtube
entitled reveals (they disabled the embed, but do watch it) that a study done earlier this year documented 150
instances of harassment, insults and physical violence inflicted on their children within a period of a single
monthMy God, They are beating their women to a bloody pulp.
It’s all about clothing and there are many more such bloody pictures of men as well as women. Note that the
picture bellow is part of a series published by the official Iranian news agency. It is part of a series of
such photos clearly designed to terrorize the population into submission.
It’s all about clothing and there are many more such bloody pictures of men as well as women. Note that the
picture bellow is part of a series published by It is part of clearly designed to terrorize the population into
submission.Iran also tries to terrorize emigres who got used to visiting Iran regularly. They chose Haleh
Esfandiari, a high profile scholar, to issue this warning. They charged her with trying to ferment a “soft
revolution.”
They know MSM will help them along by publicizing Haleh’s case but keeping the rest of their
atrocities under wraps. Objectively, if not intentionally, MSM continues to be the best friend “evil doers”
have. They ignore the evil they direct towards their own people while publicizing the evil they direct towards
their enemies.
Iran also tries to terrorize emigres who got used to visiting Iran regularly. They chose Haleh Esfandiari, a
high profile scholar, to issue this warning. They her with trying to ferment a “soft revolution.” They know MSM
will help them along by publicizing Haleh’s case but keeping the rest of their atrocities under wraps.
Objectively, if not intentionally, MSM continues to be the best friend “evil doers” have. They ignore the evil
they direct towards their own people while publicizing the evil they direct towards their enemies.Will they
ever learn? The Fiscal Muck of Illegals
5月22日 Senator Martinez doth equivocateA recent message from my U.S. Senator prompted the following Q & A session:
Martinez: "Like you, I strongly believe that one way to safeguard our homeland is to work tirelessly to secure our borders. Over the past three years, Congress has funded serious border security measures, such as adding more than 3 thousand border patrol officers, nearly 10 thousand new beds in detention centers, as well as hundreds of miles of security fencing and vehicle barriers along our southwest border."
My questions: 1. Why did Congress bother to add even one new Border Patrol Agent if, at the same time, Congress knew it would acquiese to President Bush's purposeful prosecution of agents to intimidate them NOT to protect us from illegals and/or dope-runners and/or terrorists? 2. If 10 thousand new beds in detention centers have been added, how many of the beds are in use?
2A. If the new beds are in use, are they being "hot-racked," i.e., are the detainees being kept busy trimming rights of way et al and sleeping three to a bed (one every 8 hours) as in our submarines? 3. How many miles of fencing have actually been built, and why does the new legislation (amnesty bill) cut the promised/alleged mileage of fencing in half? Why is it necessary for a private organization, The Minutemen, to do the job of the U.S. Government? Martinez: However, much work remains to be done. Last October, the President signed into law the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for fiscal year 2007 (P.L. 109-295). P.L. 109-295 provides more than $11 billion for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. This funding will help improve and expand CBP stations, install and improve fencing, lighting and vehicle barriers along the border, and to acquire technologies that focus on high-risk travelers and goods. My question: Why did Congress bother to provide more than $11 billion for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. if, at the same time, Congress knew it would acquiese to President Bush's purposeful decision NOT to employ the added operations to protect us from illegals and/or dope-runners and/or terrorists? Martinez: My highest priority is to safeguard our homeland. Please know that I will continue to work with my colleagues in Congress to provide the funds necessary to adopt security measures that would improve the safety of our nation, including reinforcing security at our nation?s borders. My questions: 1. If, indeed, your highest priority is to safeguard our homeland, why have you agreed to legislation which will, in time, return our "homeland" to Mexico? 2: Why bother providing funds necessary to adopt security measures that would "improve the safety of our nation, including reinforcing security at our nation's borders" if the President, his "justice department," you, and a majority in the House and Senate intend to ignore Americans' demands for: (a) Real border-security, and; (b) Expulsion of invaders, and; (c) Harsh penaties for scofflaw businesses which aid and abet, and hire illegals, and; (d) Cessation of welfare, school tuition, e.t.c. for illegals, and; (e) Our border patrol agents to be allowed to do their jobs (with gusto)? May I quote one of your pro-amnesty colleagues, Senator? "Let's talk. Let's chat." 5月20日 Sandy Burglar Gets a PassMost criminals who steal classified national documents receive vacations at Fort Leavenworth. Miscreants and criminals from the Clinton Administration are/were pardoned or receive petty punishments. Here's proof:
From NewsMax.com, May 20, 2007 Clinton Aide Forfeits Law License Clinton White House National Security Adviser Samuel Berger, who was convicted of taking classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, has agreed to surrender his license to practice law. In a written statement issued by his attorney, Larry Breuer, Berger, 61, said: “I have decided to voluntarily relinquish my license. While I derived great satisfaction from years of practicing law, I have not done so for 15 years and do not envision returning to the profession. I am very sorry for what I did, and I deeply apologize.” Berger, national security adviser from 1997 to 2001, was convicted of removing documents from the Archives in 2005 while preparing to testify before the 9/11 Commission. He was fined $50,000 and sentenced to 100 hours of community service, the Washington Times reported. The documents taken by Berger pertained to a terrorist assessment from 2000, before George W. Bush was sworn in as president. Specifically, they dealt with a report detailing the Clinton administration's response to so-called millennium terrorist threats — a highly secret assessment that was, according to some reports, less than stellar. The report was compiled by Richard Clarke, the same counterterrorism czar under Clinton and President Bush who criticized the latter's handling of intelligence prior to 9/11. Byron York, White House correspondent for the National Review, wrote: "Clarke apparently concluded that the millennium plot was foiled by luck — a border agent in Washington state who happened to notice a nervous, sweating man who turned out to have explosives in his car — and not by the Clinton administration's savvy anti-terrorism work." By giving up his law license, Berger avoids being cross-examined by the Board on Bar Counsel and possibly disclosing further details of his theft. 5月18日 Springtime in IslambergSpringtime in Islamberg Radical Muslim paramilitary compound flourishes in upper New YorkState Islamberg also has a website with photos: http://www.islamberg.org/ By Paul L. Williams Ph.D., (author of THE DAY OF ISLAM) Though primarily based in Lahore, Pakistan, Jamaat ul-Fuqra has operational headquarters in New York and openly recruits through various social service organizations in the U.S., including the prison system. Members live in hamaats or compounds, such as Islamberg, where they agree to abide by the laws of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, which are considered to be above local, state and federal authority. Additional hamaats have been established in Hyattsville, Maryland; Red House, Virginia; Falls Church, Virginia; Macon, Georgia; York, South Carolina; Dover, Tennessee; Buena Vista, Colorado; Talihina, Oklahoma; Tulane Country, California; Commerce, California; and Onalaska, Washington. Others are being built, including an expansive facility in Sherman, Pennsylvania. Islamo-Dog ExcrementIslamo - Dog Excrement From: WSJ On-line Journal, Best of the Web Today, May 18, 2007 'Islamophobia' http://arabnews.com/?page=4§ion=0&article=96276&d=17&m=5&y=2007 Save Your Christian Bookstore: Hire a PedophileSave your Christian Bookstore; hire a pedophile Go to: http://www.grasstopsusa.com/enda.html
When Britain legalized sodomy, conservative politician Lord Boothby asked, "Now that it's legal, how long before it's mandatory?"
Barney Frank is dancing on the steps of the Capitol, shouting his answer to Lord Boothby: If Frank were honest; you'd probably hear him say:
This year it will be mandatory! That's when we pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and cram homosexuality down the throat of every bigoted Christian in America! ENDA means you'll have to hire us -- even if what we do in the bedroom, in public toilets, and in Interstate rest stops makes you gag! And please, do not be deceived by those that tell you ENDA is simply a non-discrimination measure. That argument is a red-herring -- an argument designed to shame decent, sensitive and feeling folks into not opposing ENDA.
After all, who wants to be in favor of "discrimination?" The truth of the matter is: there is NO national epidemic of discrimination against homosexuals in the workplace... PERIOD! It simply does not exist!
The real un-told purpose behind the passage of ENDA -- like so-called hate-crimes legislation before it -- is much more sinister.
If passed, how would this vile law work?
If you're still confused, check out this soul-sickening scenario:
For years, Mom and Dad -- church-going Bible-believers -- have operated a candy store on the corner of Main and Reagan. After school and on Saturdays, the place is swarming with children and their parents.
When they advertise for a clerk, the leader of the local "gay rights" movement applies for the job. He is an in-your-face pervert who struts and swaggers around town, boasting of his unnatural behavior with other men.
He tells Mom and Dad: "You're Christian bigots and if you don't hire me, I'll haul you into court, and you'll have to pay a huge fine, if not spend time behind bars." Mom and Dad have three choices:
Make no mistake. That is the real purpose behind ENDA. ENDA has nothing to do with ending non-existent "discrimination" against homosexuals. ENDA's ONLY purpose is to punish people who refuse to accept the radical homosexual agenda. For the rest of the story go to: http://www.grasstopsusa.com/enda.html
Tunisia's War on TerrorDjerba, Tunisia -- On its face, this little-known North African Oasis, a mere speck on the global map, may seem like an unlikely target of terrorism. But in April of 2002, Tunisian Islamist Nizar Nawar crashed a fuel tanker into the island’s synagogue -- one of Africa’s oldest and among the last left intact in the country -- killing nearly twenty people, most of them German tourists. Shortly thereafter, al-Qaeda released an audio tape announcing the attack as its handiwork. The government, reluctant to acknowledge that Tunisia had a terrorism problem, avoided all mention of the word. Five years on, little has changed. In interviews with FrontPage last week, sources close to the Tunisian government maintained that Nawar was no Islamist. Instead, they said, he was a common criminal frustrated with his inability to find employment; the notion that he was connected to al-Qaeda, they say, is “propaganda” spread by Western journalists. “Islam has nothing to do with it,” one source insisted. Similar denials issue from the highest levels of government. When asked about the 2002 attack at a recent press conference, Dijani Haddad, Tunisia’s minister or tourism, avoided all reference of “terrorism,” alluding vaguely to a “crisis.” Terrorism, he stressed, was contrary to “Tunisian comportment.” Official efforts to downplay its threat notwithstanding, Islamic terrorism in North Africa is a dangerously real phenomenon. In April, al-Qaeda affiliate Group for Preaching and Combat, an Algerian terrorist organization more commonly known by its French acronym, GSPC, set off twin bomb blasts near the headquarters of the prime minister’s office in the capital of Algiers -- a brazen act of terror that ended a tenuous reprieve from violence that had held since the 1990s. Earlier this month, intelligence agents in neighboring Morocco warned that al-Qaeda-allied militants were plotting attacks in the country. For the rest of the story, go to www.frontpagemag.com 5月14日 Self-defense? Get suspended and shrinked!From Wall Street Journal, On-line Journal, Best of the Web Today, May 14, '07
Mistaking Words for Weapons http://citypages.com/databank/28/1379/article15402.asp The day after the Virginia Tech massacre, we noted http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110009953#gunfree that an earlier shooting at a Virginia campus had been cut short when a student with a legal handgun helped subdue the killer. We suggested that perhaps Virginia Tech officials' decision to designate their campus "gun-free" was not the wisest choice. Well, it's a good thing we aren't still in college, and not only because we're way too old. If we were, we might have gotten into trouble just for employing our First Amendment rights to defend others' Second Amendment rights. It happened to Troy Scheffler, a 31-year-old graduate student at Hamline University in St. Paul, Minn., as City Pages, a local weekly, reports: *** QUOTE *** In the aftermath [of Virginia Tech], officials at Hamline University sought to comfort their 4,000 students. David Stern, the vice president for academic and student affairs, sent a campus-wide email offering extra counseling sessions for those who needed help coping. Scheffler had a different opinion of how the university should react. Using the email handle "Tough Guy Scheffler," Troy fired off his response: Counseling wouldn't make students feel safer, he argued. They needed protection. And the best way to provide it would be for the university to lift its recently implemented prohibition against concealed weapons. "Ironically, according to a few VA Tech forums, there are plenty of students complaining that this wouldn't have happened if the school wouldn't have banned their permits a few months ago," Scheffler wrote. "I just don't understand why leftists don't understand that criminals don't care about laws; that is why they're criminals. Maybe this school will reconsider its repression of law-abiding citizens' rights." . . . On April 23, Scheffler received a letter informing him he'd been placed on interim suspension. To be considered for readmittance, he'd have to pay for a psychological evaluation and undergo any treatment deemed necessary, then meet with the dean of students, who would ultimately decide whether Scheffler was fit to return to the university. . . . Scheffler obeyed the campus ban and didn't go to class, but his classmate, Kenny Bucholz, told him a police officer was stationed outside the classroom. "He had a gun and everything," Bucholz says. *** END QUOTE *** Hey, wait. Why would the policeman need a gun? Oh yeah, for protection! 5月11日 Jihaddists' Stinky FeetJihadist feet washing just the beginning By: Steve Yuhas
White guilt is a simple concept whose time has come and gone. Typically felt by people on the left who are of European decent – they feel guilty about things that their ancestors did (or did not) do to blacks or Indians. That guilt has pretty much been tapped since times are good for the vast majority of blacks and Indians so the left had to find a way to feel bad about a group of people.
This time they found a doozy. Who better to feel guilty for than for a group of people that produced 19 men capable of killing 3,000 people and bringing down American landmarks? Once again they can overcompensate for alleged wrongs – this time for Muslims. It doesn’t matter if people are Muslim by birth, choice or force because they were held captive by a government or a machine gun or knife toting masked man on a video tape. The left and by definition bureaucrats all over American can now feel guilty and overcompensate for Muslim guilt in ways that no other group would ever dreamed.
Overcompensation for white guilt was pretty drab and easy: redistribute wealth, allow unqualified people to be promoted based on race and allow affirmative action programs in everything from college selection to government contracts. It is so much better with Islam because now there is stuff they can do that they never could under white guilt.
Muslims have the benefit of forcing the left to throw out many of their previously held beliefs. It is especially true with the supposed wall of separation between church and state that liberals trot out every time Christmas rolls around or when Jews defend themselves against Arabs in Israel.
It seems that because some Muslims feel bad that they are looked at suspiciously when they’re praying at airports and collecting items before a flight that could be used as weapons that Americans should feel enormous guilt for them. Add to that fact that a few were mistakenly rounded up after 3,000 people were killed by Muslims who practiced their faith on airplanes on September 11, 2001 and all bets are off when it comes to that previously adored separation.
Recently public schools and airports (forgive the irony) decided to install feet washing devices so that Muslims in airports, cab drivers who service them and Muslims at public colleges can wash their feet before they pray.
The left is embracing the idea and there has been no outcry about spending public money on what is clearly a private religious ritual, but you can’t blame people on the right for being confused about public money being spent to give one faith facilities that no other groups are being given.
I suppose if the September 11th hijackers were Jewish the ACLU and groups of terrorists from CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) would jump to the front of the line to install Mikvahs in public buildings across the country – oh wait – they would do no such thing because these same groups become apoplectic at the site of a Menorah or Nativity Scene at Chanukah or Christmas.
So what is it about Islam that allows the left to ignore the fact that the government sponsoring Islamic rituals is far more offensive to the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause than a little town putting up a Christmas tree?
Muslim-guilt.
It was bound to happen because every mention of the word Muslim or Islam that comes from a politician or bureaucrat is followed or prefaced by the obligatory phraseology about Islam being a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Islamic people want to live in peace with the west. Of course there is no data to support this and the fact that the United States has a favorability rating of about 8% in the Muslim world the math proves the premise wrong.
And who can forget the number of people in the Arab world who are willing to stand in line to chop the head off a Jew or blow up a bus – taught to them at the tender age of six courtesy of Arab government television and the use of a badly dressed knock off of Mickey Mouse (Palestinian television is paid for using the money supplied by Western governments and the United States).
Minnesota has allowed publicly funded colleges to add the same foot washing devices that are being used in Kansas City for cab drivers to pray at the airport. It begs the question about how the ACLU, the left, the separation of church and state lunatics and Muslim groups would react if Jewish Mikvahs or fonts of holy water blessed by the Pope were installed instead of or before the Muslim feet washing equipment.
It is probably not a stretch to say that the reaction would not have been friendly.
The ACLU fought for decades for a cross to be removed from a war memorial on public land in San Diego and for crosses to be taken off of county seals in Los Angeles. CAIR gets bent out of shape every time a Muslim is portrayed on television as a terrorist – what happened to doing anything in the name of art – forget that most terrorists today are Arab.
Americans need not feel Muslim guilt any more than they felt white guilt over the decades, but the left loves guilt and victimization. The government should not pay for Muslims to wash their feet nor should it pay to have children baptized or for a Jewish couple to hold a bris for their son.
Editorial pages around the country have written about the fact that there is no harm in having feet washing stations for Muslims, but these are the same slippery slope loving folks who think a cross on a county seal is the beginning of a Christian rebellion. The whole dynamic would change if it were Christians getting special treatment or if Jews were getting special places set aside in public spaces.
Now that the door has been opened to government sponsorship of Islam I would like to have a Mikvah installed at any airport I may be at and demand my Catholic friends get a font of holy water blessed by the Pope.
There is a real slippery slope here and it begins with tax dollars going to a group of people who share an ideology with people who want to have the flag of Islam flying over the White House.
It is bad enough that it is flying over airports and a few public colleges – where else do you want it?
Elevating Islam because so many politicians are afraid of it above every other religion and using tax dollars to subsidize the practice of it is just as wrong and unconstitutional as taking away my gun. The only difference is that while we overcompensated for white guilt over the years the worst thing to happen was bad government programs.
Overcompensating with Islam and having it practiced in airports and college campuses at public expense gives the Jihadist exactly what they want – America as an Islamic state. That – to be sure – is something to fear; much more than a Nativity Scene or Menorah at Christmas or Chanukah.
Steve Yuhas is a radio talk show host on AM 600 KOGO and may be reached at steve@steveyuhas.com or www.steveyuhas.com Jihaddists Exploit Our Hospitality - Malkinby Michelle Malkin
Jihadists Exploit Our Hospitality and Open Borders . . . Again
May 09, 2007 02:00 PM EST
Well, here is the thanks we get. Eight years ago, America opened its arms to tens of thousands of ethnic Albanian refugees from Kosovo. The first planeload landed at Fort Dix, New Jersey. Military leaders worked day and night to turn the base into a child-friendly village. They coordinated medical and security checkups, mental health and trauma counseling and ethnic food preparations. Soldiers from Fort Bragg traveled up from North Carolina to assist in refugee operations at Fort Dix. Then-U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Mitchell M. Zais also assembled a team of about 80 soldiers from the U.S. Army Reserve Command in Atlanta. The New Jersey National Guard and American Red Cross teamed up to coordinate charity relief. The military also supported the relief effort's interagency task force, headed by the Department of Health and Human Services. In addition to food and shelter, we provided translators, welfare consultants and Muslim chaplains. The base constructed prayer rooms and handed out Muslim "sensitivity" cards to the troops. Said Gen. Zais: "We want to welcome these people to America the way we might wish our grandparents and great-grandparents had been welcomed to Ellis Island." Fast-forward from 1999 to yesterday's headline news: "Fort Dix Plot Aimed At Soldiers; Authorities Say 6 Islamic Militants Arrested, Were Plotting Attack At N.J. Base." Three of the alleged plotters were illegal alien brothers from the former Yugoslavia. Another was a legal permanent resident from the former Yugoslavia. Another hailed from Jordan, and the sixth was a naturalized American citizen originally from Turkey. According to the criminal complaint against Dritan Duka, one of the illegal alien brothers accused of knowingly and willfully conspiring with the jihadi gang to kill U.S. soldiers, the plotters have schemed for more than a year to murder our troops. They scoped out Dover Air Force Base and Fort Monmouth, as well as the port of Philadelphia, before settling on Fort Dix. One of the participants used to deliver pizza to the base -- used to supply food to our men and women in uniform giving him business -- and knew the military facility "like the palm of his hand." You think all our hospitality and charity bred good will in these young men -- all in their 20s and enjoying the fruits of the American Dream? Forget about it. The criminal complaint describes the plotters, along with a confidential informant, gathering at a rental house to train with Mujahadin video games: "Members of the group pointed out that United States military vehicles were shown being destroyed in various attacks. [Illegal alien] Shain Duka pointed out that a United States Marine's arm had been blown off, at which point laughter erupted from the group." Just hard-working, "undocumented citizens" plotting the plots and laughing at the anti-American atrocities ordinary Americans wouldn't laugh at, yeah? If they had only laid low a few extra months, they might have gotten that illegal alien amnesty President Bush and Congress are so eager to hand out. According to the criminal complaint, they laughed at our troops getting maimed and killed. They soaked up Osama bin Laden's evil rants. They studied the 9/11 hijackers' last wills and testaments. They contemplated infiltrating our armed forces to frag soldiers from the inside. They relished the thought of spilling American blood on American soil. Is yours boiling yet? "My intent is to hit a heavy concentration of soldiers," Jordanian-born naturalized U.S. citizen Mohamad Shnewer is quoted telling the plotters. "You hit four, five, six humvees and light the whole place [up] and retreat completely without any losses." Eight years ago, at the Clinton administration's behest, this nation welcomed refugees escaping a genocidal regime whose military spread fear and brutalized its people. Eight years later, we have a homegrown jihad plot targeting a base that symbolizes the best, the brightest and the most compassionate our military has to offer. And what is the Muslim community doing to condemn the accused traitors in our midst? Carping about the government's actions to stop jihad in its tracks: "If these people did something, then they deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law," said Muslim lawyer Sohail Mohammed. "But when the government says 'Islamic militants,' it sends a message to the public that Islam and militancy are synonymous.'" The thanks we get, huh? Michelle Malkin is author of "Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild." Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com. 5月9日 Jihad in U.S. StreetsMay 09, 2007
JIHAD IN U.S. STREETS
5月8日 The Speech Bush Should GiveThe speech Bush should give tomorrow From the ‘netBUSH: Normally, I start these things out by saying “My Fellow Americans…” Not doing it this time. If the polls are any indication, I don’t know who more than half of you are anymore. I do know something terrible has happened, and that you’re really not fellow Americans any longer. I’ll cut right to the chase here: I quit. Now before anyone gets all in a lather about me quitting to avoid impeachment, or to avoid prosecution or something, let me assure you: there’s been no breaking of laws or impeachable offenses in this office. The reason I’m quitting is simple. I’m fed up with you people. I'm fed up because you have no understanding of what's really going on in the world. Or of what’s going on in this once-great nation of ours. And the majority of you are too damned lazy to do your homework and figure it out. Let's start local. You’ve been sold a bill of goods by politicians and the news media. Polls show that the majority of you think the economy is in the tank. And that’s despite record numbers of homeowners including record numbers of MINORITY homeowners. And while we’re mentioning minorities, I’ll point out that minority business ownership is at an all-time high. Our unemployment rate is as low as it ever was during the Clinton Administration. I’ve mentioned all those things before, but it doesn’t seem to have sunk in. Despite the shock to our economy of 9/11, the stock market has rebounded to record levels and more Americans than ever are participating in these markets. Meanwhile, all you can do is whine about gas prices. We face real threats in the world. Don’t give me this ˜blood for oil” thing. If I was trading blood for oil I would’ve already seized Iraq’s oil fields and let the rest of the country go to hell. And don’t give me this ‘Bush Lied People Died’ crap either. If I was the liar you morons take me for, I could’ve easily had chemical weapons planted in Iraq so they could be ‘discovered.’ Instead, I owned up to the fact that the intelligence was faulty. Let me remind you that the rest of the world thought Saddam had the goods, same as me. Let me also remind you that regime change in Iraq was official US policy before I came into office. Some guy named ‘Clinton’ established that policy. Bet you didn’t know that, did you? You need to understand that we face a unique enemy. Back during the cold war, there were two major competing political and economic models squaring off. We won that war, but we did so because fundamentally, the Communists wanted to survive, just as we do. We were simply able to outspend and out-tech them. That’s not the case this time. The soldiers of our new enemy don’t care if they survive. In fact, they want to die. That’d be fine, as long as they weren’t also committed to taking as many of you with them as they can. But they are. They want to kill you. And the bastards are all over the globe. You should be grateful that they haven’t gotten any more of us here in the United States since September 11. But you’re not. That’s because you’ve got no idea how hard a small number of intelligence, military, law enforcement and homeland security people have worked to make sure of that. When this whole mess started, I warned you that this would be a long and difficult fight. I’m disappointed how many of you people think a long and difficult fight amounts to a single season of ‘Survivor’. Instead, you’ve grown impatient. You’re incapable of seeing things through the long lens of history, the way our enemies do. You think that wars should last a few months, a few years, tops. Making matters worse, you actively support those who help the enemy. Every time you buy the New York Times, every time you send a donation to a cut-and-run Democrat’s political campaign, well, dammit, you might just as well Fedex a grenade launcher to a Jihadist. It amounts to the same thing. In this day and age, it’s easy enough to find the truth. It’s all over the Internet. It just isn’t on the pages of the New York Times or on NBC News. But even if it were, I doubt you’d be any smarter. Most of you would rather watch American Idol. I could say more about your expectations that the government will always be there to bail you out, even if you’re too stupid to leave a city that’s below sea level and has a hurricane approaching. I could say more about your insane belief that government, not your own wallet, is where the money comes from. But I’ve come to the conclusion that it would sail right over your heads. So I quit. I’m going back to Crawford. I’ve got an energy-efficient house down there (Al Gore could only dream) and the capability to be fully self-sufficient. No one ever heard of Crawford before I got elected, and as soon as I’m done here pretty much no one will ever hear of it again. Maybe I’ll be lucky enough to die of old age before the last pillars of America fall. Oh, and by the way, Cheney’s quitting too. That means Pelosi is your new President. You asked for it. Watch what she does carefully, because I still have a glimmer of hope that there’re just enough of you remaining who are smart enough to turn this thing around in 2008. So that’s it. God bless what’s left of America. Some of you know what I mean. 5月7日 Jihaddists win: Truth is HATE From: www.americancongressfortruth.org, May 07, 2007
CAIR Cheers "Thought Crime" Bill Passageby Brigette Gabriel Of course, we already have thought crime in America. When public figures and media talking heads (you know who I'm talking about -- almost everybody, Left and Right) relentlessly purvey polite fictions about Islam as a religion of peace instead of having the courage to challenge the American Muslim community, we have thoughtcrime. Challenge the American Muslim community? Yes -- to confront the elements of Islam that the jihadists are using to justify violence and formulate positive ways to neutralize their capacity to be used in such a way. In other words, to institute large-scale programs -- transparent, sincere, and verifiable ones -- to teach against the jihad ideology and Islamic supremacism in American schools and mosques. This would actually empower the reformers these people claim to support, since no reform can begin until one is ready to admit that something needs reforming. But the Matthews and Dobbses and Hannitys and Becks of the world would rather play pretend. They'd rather tell their viewers fantasies and fictions rather than deal with harsh realities, because to do otherwise would be to commit thoughtcrime. CAIR and its ilk have already been quite successful in casting any honest discussion of the elements of Islam that are being used today by the jihadists to justify their actions as "anti-Muslim," "Islamophobic," "bigoted," "hateful," etc. And the fearless free media cowers in terror. In reality, however, it is not anti-Muslim, "Islamophobic," bigoted or hateful simply to point out what Muhammad taught, according to the earliest Islamic sources, and what the Qur'an says, as interpreted by the mainstream Sunni schools of jurisprudence, and what Islamic law says, and what the record of Islamic history is. How could such a thing be hateful, or loving, for that matter? It is what it is. The fact that almost no major media types will dare to look at this material squarely shows how effective the Orwellian mau-mauing has been. Thoughtcrime is real, and few are willing to commit it. And now the House of Representatives of the United States of America has joined the cowering crowd, passing a bill that, if it becomes law (as it likely will once a Democratic president is in office in 2009), will make it illegal to discuss the root causes of the problem that threatens to destroy Europe within our lifetimes, forces every Israeli to leave his home every day not knowing if he will return, and was responsible for the largest mass murder ever on American soil (no, the perp wasn't Cho Seung Hui). That CAIR loves this bill and has worked for it is no surprise -- it is the same sort of thing as their Flying Imams lawsuit. That one would make Americans too afraid to report a Muslim acting suspiciously in an airport or on a plane, effectively giving jihad terrorists a free hand. This one could make quoting bin Laden and asking peaceful Muslims to stand up against jihad terrorism more effectively in both words and deeds into a crime -- that of "Islamophobia," as the mau-mauers have dubbed it. It's funny how the noble and glorious words of the Qur'an become "hate speech" when I simply quote them -- it reminds me of a wonderful short story by Jorge Luis Borges about which I'll be writing more soon -- but that is what I do, and that is an accusation I have often received. (Go to http://www.jihadwatch.org:80/archives/016297.php for the full story.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|